return to research page
The Distinct Brilliance of Zappai:
Publication: Simply Haiku 3.1 (Spring 2005)
This article argues for the removal of the term zappai from the recently published Haiku Society of America (HSA) definitions of both haiku and senryu. Zappai in the HSA definition is equated with “pseudohaiku” and “doggerel verse.” Statements are also made inferring that zappai are without literary value, and it is implied that zappai are not worth memorializing as literature. The HSA valuation of zappai states:
Many so-called "haiku" in English are really senryu. Others, such as "Spam-ku" and "headline haiku", seem like recent additions to an old Japanese category, zappai, miscellaneous amusements in doggerel verse (usually written in 5-7-5) with little or no literary value. Some call the products of these recent fads "pseudohaiku" to make clear that they are not haiku at all.
As the HSA mentions in its “preliminary notes” to the definitions: “we hope the results of our efforts are faithful to the spirit of these words' Japanese origins . . . ;” if there is veracity to this statement, the HSA needs to disassociate the term zappai from the derogatory connotations given, as the definition and explanation of zappai is misguided and incorrect. This important literary term, pre-existing in Japanese literature and culture has been manipulated in English in order to lend credence to an English‑language literary issue. Since there has been scant public mention of zappai, or substantive discussion relating to potential problems of its use in English, it is unclear how this term has suddenly found its way into two important English-language haiku‑genre definitions. A closer look the literature of zappai as it exists in Japanese literary history and contemporary literary culture seems warranted.
Several haiku and haikai poets we have spoken to in our locale of Kumamoto feel that the linking of zappai to such writings as spam-ku and headline haiku in English is inappropriate and culturally offensive, as zappai has evolved directly out of the ancient haikai tradition. That is, to equate zappai, a genre of Japanese literature with a publication history reaching back, as haikai, to at least the 14th century with spam-ku and the like is culturally demeaning. The use of zappai as a derogatory term determining a trashbin category of the English haiku genre is highly inappropriate.
We would like to answer several questions in this article: What constitutes zappai? Why is the derogatory appelation of zappai in English considered culturally insensitive, in Japan? Are zappai poems really “pseudohaiku,” or something else altogether? Is there authoritative evidence establishing the literary value of zappai in Japan? Is zappai a poetic genre which garners respect in contemporary Japanese literary circles? We wish to shed light on zappai by providing examples of prevailing expert opinion, poetic examples, and sources which may offer clues to its Japanese cultural context. A number of excellent books have been written on the subject in Japanese; this present article presents an overview of preliminary findings. For the sake of brevity and relevance, we will focus this article on a point‑by‑point refutation of the HSA statements found in the definition of zappai.
Disagreements with the HSA definition
1) HSA Statement: “An old Japanese category.” Zappai developed out of haikai (humouous linked verse, an outgrowth of renga) and importantly, survive as a contemporary literary form of cultural expression, with composition groups, competitions, etc. To say it is an old category implies that zappai are defunct. Zappai is no more an “old category” than haiku (viz the hokku of Bashō) or senryu are old categories—the appellation is misleading. Further, the term “category” seems demeaning, as zappai is a separate literary genre, not a trashbin category of haiku, as implied. In fact, the main zappai tradition has not evolved from the haiku/hokku.
2) HSA Statement: “Miscellaneous amusements in doggerel verse.” (see Appendix A: Definition of "doggerel verse.") We show below that several esteemed literary critics consider some zappai equal in aesthetic and literary merit to haiku—and that the genre as a whole warrants treatment as a serious and important literature. In other words, the global appellation of “miscellaneous amusement” is not an acceptable definer of zappai, if “miscellaneous” is taken to mean unimportant and forgettable. Just as with senryu, certainly, some zappai over the centuries of its history were miscellaneous amusements and doggerel verses. There have also been many inferior and forgettable haiku (hokku) published. We strongly object to the term “doggerel verse” for zappai, particularly in that: “almost by definition examples of doggerel are not preserved, since if they have any redeeming value they are not considered doggerel" (Appendix A). The term should not be applied to zappai.
3) HSA Statement: “Little or no literary value.” This statement has offended our local region here in Japan, which has had a long and unbroken tradition of writing a form of zappai in local-language dialect: higo-kyōku. Information and examples of contemporary zappai from two different regions of Japan will be given below.
4) HSA Statement: “Pseudohaiku.” Zappai in Japan as practiced both today and historically, for the most part use haikai “linking” and “verse capping” stylism, and are not directly related to haiku, Masaoka Shiki’s late 19th century innovation, which developed from the hokku, the first stanza of a renga or haikai-renga. The hokku, that is, the 5-7-5 first stanza of the linked‑stanza poem‑forms just mentioned, typically written by two or three (though sometimes one, or additional) poets, began to be treated as a separate poem about 160 years before Bashō’s publishing career got underway—the first anthology exclusively devoted to hokku was Sōgi’s posthumous Jinensai hokku (1506).
In fact, zappai of whatever stripe do not find their main lineage in the hokku, but in the broader genre of haikai humor, and particularly in the hiraku verses of haikai—as such, inferring that zappai have a direct relationship with the genre of haiku (the hokku, particularly as exemplified by Bashō) is questionable: evidence contradicts the assertion. Hiraku indicates stanzas which are found in the body of a haikai-renga, ergo, after the first three stanzas, and excepting the concluding stanza of a haikai (note: haikai, haikai‑renga and haikai‑no‑renga are synonyms. “Haikai‑no‑renga” is quite an uncommon, or unknown, phrase in Japanese literary circles—hence we avoid it; the others are commonly used). Zappai do have many varieties; there is a minor historic form which is related to the hokku; however most, including those we have found used at present are based on the hiraku stanzas of haikai (the scholars quoted below relate zappai to hiraku verses only, as a distinguishing feature). Consequently, contemporary zappai as we find them are not directly related to the haiku (hokku) at all. Zappai do have a profound relationship with the deep literary and cultural sense of haikai humor, which can be traced directly back to the first 14th century renga anthology Tsukuba-shū (1356 A.D.), which contains a chapter of haikai‑renga.
We note here another mistake in the HSA definition, which states that “haikai is: “linked verse originating in the sixteenth century.” This is untrue. Though the main era of haikai “development [was] in the 17th century under Bashō and his adherents,” the discrete haikai genre extends as published literature at least into the 14th century (as mentioned just above), and further back to the Heian era, in the form of mushin renga: “The mushin renga led to haikai no renga, more familiarly haikai (or renku in recent times). Haikai means something like 'humorous' . . . . From the 12th century . . . . Thousands, no doubt millions, of [renga] stanzas were composed, the majority in non‑standard, or mushin renga and haikai. The more serious [ushin renga] were [however] more apt to be recorded” (ibid). The significant point is that zappai are part of a millennial, unbroken Japanese literary tradition which mixes humor with high‑culture poetic forms, almost always loosening, breaking or disregarding the fixed rules of the “serious” form. Without “haikai taste,” we would not have haiku, or senryu either, and certainly not zappai. The matter of “haikai taste,” that is the poetic flavor of humor in all haikai poetic genres needs re‑estimation in English, as its historic and contemporary cultural and literary significance seems lacking in English‑language discussions—with the result that zappai could be termed “doggerel” and “miscellaneous amusement;” statements that ignore and disvalue cultural context. More needs to be said regarding “haikai taste,” however space does not permit.
5) HSA statement: “They are not haiku at all.” This concluding statement is a false analogy, as outlined above. The statement implies an equivalence, such that zappai = pseudohaiku = not haiku. Actually, this is the real case: A (“zappai”) does NOT equal B (“pseudohaiku”) which does equal C (“not haiku”). A does equal C however, in that zappai are not haiku—but for entirely different reasons than pseudohaiku (whatever they may be) are not haiku. It is a case of apples and oranges. Zappai are a separate genre: they cannot be considered to be “pseudo” haiku. Zappai have sometimes been mixed up with senryu in Japan, and scholars have gone to some lengths to clarify the distinction. A strict definition of senryu is that it is a variety of zappai (see Appendix B). This may come as a surprise!
To begin defining zappai, here is a definitive commentary from two experts on zappai and haikai. In the Chapter, “What Transcends Haiku Masterpieces” [syūku wo koeru mono] from his book Is Japan a Haiku Country? (Nihon ha haiku no kuni ka, Kadokawa Shoten, 1996), Katō Ikuya has composed the following paragraph, with reference to another expert, Katsutada Suzuki:
Zappai means: other haikai schools with a wide variety of uncategorized styles; it does not mean pseudo-haikai [un- or non-formal haikai]. Suzuki Katsutada defined zappai this way: “Zappai can be defined as haikai in which human feelings are composed in hiraku form, which cannot be incorporated into existing haikai.” It is quite displeasing that zappai has been looked down upon in relation to ordinary haikai, and mixed up with maekudzuke (in haikai-renga: completing a 7-7 verse with a 5-7-5 verse), senryū, or kokkeiku (a humorous stanza, usually 5-7-5 or 7-7 verse).
We notice immediately that Ikuya writes “pseudo‑haikai;” not: haiku/hokku. In the above determination, zappai mainly has a historical origin in, and relationship to, the body-stanzas of haikai-renga, and not hokku (the first stanza). As we assembled this article, Shinjuku commented: The above definition is a bit abstract. Suzuki Katsutada states that zappai cannot be incorporated into haikai. The reasons seem fairly obvious, when considering the contemporary zappai genre: the use of local dialect, local compositional rules, and a variety of other possible local characteristics would probably be some of the main reasons. Some well-known and esteemed examples of zappai are Awaji-zappai, Tosa‑kyōku, Higo‑kyōku and Satsuma‑kyōku. Non-Japanese people may not realize that the leading word in each of the above terms is a place name: Awajishima, Tosa, Higo, and Satsuma. Each of these locales has a highly prized form of “uncategorizable” haikai, due to language-dialect and local varieties of intonation—but also local rules of composition, which may involve social interaction—that is, the manner in which zappai (or kyōku—a zappai variant) schools operate. A person from Tokyo (who speaks the dialect of hyōjyun-go) may likely have a difficult time understanding higo-kyōku, a Kumamoto Prefecture (Higo) zappai form, without instruction from a native—as it is written in the local dialect and its rhythms expressed in unique regional stylism.
Zappai is generally considered a form of linked poetry, and there are many different rules for composition. For instance in higo-kyōku, the higo-kyōku master will write the first 5-on of a 5-7-5 stanza (this stanza may be over or under 5-on: ji-amari or jitarazu), and then poets in the group will add 7-5-on to complete the poem (this compositional style is known as kasadzuke). Unlike haikai, the part added by the poet (known as tsukeku) is always 7-5-on. (So, higo-kyōku is always 5-7-5-on; with the exception of the first metric line, as noted above.) There are other features found in Awaki‑zappai. In one form of Awaji-zappai, the zappai master gives only the first sound (‑on) of each metric line of 5-7-5-on (this compositional method is known as oriku, a technique of haikai).
Examples of contemporary zappai
It needs to be mentioned, preceding the below examples, that the multiple resonances of regional flavor, rhythm, cultural and comic nuance are fairly untranslatable; readers may hopefully infer there is often more than meets the eye, in the original language and context. Just below are some examples of Awaji-zappai, collected in The Logic of Early Modern Fixed-form Poetry, by Tsukushi Bansei (Kindai teikei no ronri, Yū Shorin, 2004). The author offers his considered opinion of the literary merit of zappai, in comparison with the haiku genre, as a serious literature:
Thus, unlike senryu, zappai is not only composed of humorous stanzas. Probably at this point, readers understand that zappai has a unique expression, techniques and approaches, and that some zappai are equal in measure to haiku (p. 42).
Some examples of award-winning Kumamoto Prefecture higo-kyōku, from the 2003 annual contest sponsored by RKK Television:
kikoen furi moutokkuri wa araiyoru
pretending deafness already washing the sake bottle Mitarai Kiyoshi
miteminufuri yomeshūtome mo umaku iku
no eyes no ears no mouth the wife and step-mother doing well Iwashita Yumiko
makkurayami hamatte wakaru mizutamari
sheer darkness falling and finding the rainpuddle Nakagawa Ryūseki
Briefly then, here are five reasons for the removal of the term “zappai” from the HSA definitions:
1) Zappai is a separate traditional genre-category of poetry. It is not an attempt at (is not pseudo) haiku (or pseudo hokku).
2) Contemporary zappai covers a variety of 5-7-5 and 7-7 based poetry which contains local, regional-colloquial (dialect and accent) language styles. To consider local-language and regional poetic forms as inferior to aristocratic-central (Tokyo-dialect) language forms is elitist and reactionary. Such an attitude may have been accepted in some historic traditionalist haiku circles, but it is not acceptable today.
3) The idea of a hierarchal ranking of poetic forms in Japan is an old saw, a stereotyping of literary value and a questionable practice. Many poets find the idea offensive and unproductive. Those who hold to this idea of a ranking system can be considered “pre-modern” in their approach to poetic literature. The notable poet Hoshinaga Fumio refers to the idea of hierarchal ranking in a dismissive fashion, as “the traditionalist order” (Gilbert, Modern Haiku, 35:3, Autumn 2004, pp. 42-3), strongly resisting the idea of the typing of poets (haijin, shijin, etc.) in Japan. Further, zappai essentially contain haikai humor, wordplay, and insight into culture and reality. Literally thousands of zappai competitions that have occurred and awards conferred throughout zappai history, up to the present. Given this cultural context, shall we declare a popular cultural art of a foreign country, with strong contemporary ethnic roots, to be without merit?
4) Cultural insensitivity. Zappai is a variety of haikai, and not “lesser.” Some critics find the “serious” variety of zappai to have greater literary merit than senryu; that is, zappai are not merely ‘miscellaneous amusements in doggerel verse’. Mainly though, Japanese regional‑language poets who are aware of the English-language idea of zappai have become offended at the implied slight to their local poetic traditions and culture.
5) Usurpation; the divining of a misleading or idiosyncratic meaning from a pre-existing literary term outside of its cultural context: utilizing its unknown, exotic flavor as a means of validation in an “outside” language and literature. The colonizing of a pre-existing cultural idea and expression by another culture has been a bane of the English‑language haiku movement. If there is to be a further evolution of haiku definitions that utilize pre‑existing (especially unfamiliar) Japanese terms, forethought and academic rigor are likely necessary.
We respect the desire and work done by the HSA to create improved definitions for the haiku genre. While we hold no animus toward the organization, and applaud its fine accomplishments in promoting haiku in North America and around the world, and its continuing cross‑cultural interchange with Japan and other countries, we feel there is great opportunity in accurately discerning contemporary Japanese literature and culture, which is composed of an innovative and diverse mix of poetic styles and approaches, which often overlap—to the point where there exist many exceptions to traditional genre definitions.
There are no literary labels that we are aware of in Japanese literature for a variety of poetry that is “garbage.” If we wish to create a “garbage” or “pseudo” haiku category in our haiku, we may do so at our pleasure—sticking to our own language and literary culture. There is a further issue—whether we need to formally define such a category at all. It is not clear that such a step is necessary. As George Carlin might say, doesn't the word "trash" itself successfully cover the concept? And, someone’s garbage may be another’s innovation; perhaps a word to the wise.
An instance of “haikai taste” – 5-7-5 poetry in popular culture
We note that Katō Ikuya partly defines zappai as “haikai schools” possessing “a wide variety of uncategorized styles.” Taking his definition in its broad sense, we might say that 5-7-5 poetry which exhibits “haikai taste” and does not otherwise fall into the category of haiku or senryu could be considered zappai — not as a throwaway category but simply as an unclassifiable genre of 5-7-5 Japanese poetry with “haikai taste.” Many poems that fit this broad definition. As an example, the famous director, producer, actor, writer, comedian, and perennial television guest host, Kitano “Beat” Takeshi (recently appointed to a professorship at the Tokyo National University of Fine Arts and Music, Tokyo geijyutsu daigaku), composed a 5-7-5 poem which has become popularly known throughout Japan:
aka shingō minna de watareba kowaku‑nai
at the red light if you cross together no need to fear
This poem is based on kōtsū anzen hyōgo, “traffic safety mottos,” which are written by kindergarten and elementary‑school children everywhere (that is, everyone), as part of their Japanese language‑learning. For instance, one of the most well‑known mottos is:
te wo agete ōdanhodō wo watarō yo
Let’s put out a hand: cross at the pedestrian crosswalk!
Even four and five‑year olds know this one. Such a motto would not be classified as poetic, though it is 5‑7‑5, and participates in the unique flavor of 5-7-5 metrics, rooted in Japanese language and culture. There are thousands of such sayings. Takeshi’s play upon not only the genre of the traffic motto, but the intent (traffic safety), contains the quality of haikai taste. Nonetheless, it isn’t senryu, as it’s a poem based on a coinage of the “traffic safety motto” genre. This may be classified as zappai, according to the broad definition. While Takeshi’s coinage may not be high art, it is culturally significant, ironic, and playful—in fact, the poem points out the problematic phenomenon of mass psychology, as a form of social critique. Takeshi’s zappai is justly memorable, as it resonates with prevailing cultural issues and its meaning is multilayered — is it actually high art after all? We leave it to the reader to decide, as we are not in a position to assume. Caveat Emptor.
Definition of “Doggerel”
Doggerel describes verse considered of little literary value. The word is derogatory, from Middle English.
Doggerel might have any or all of the following failings:
Almost by definition examples of doggerel are not preserved, since if they have any redeeming value they are not considered doggerel. Some poets however make a virtue of writing what appears to be doggerel but is actually clever and entertaining despite its apparent technical faults.
APPENDIX B: The Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan
Composed by Japanese scholars, this massive multi-volume encyclopedia is arguably among the best sources of Japanese cultural lore available in the English language. We are curious why the HSA Definitions Committee has overlooked this resource. The following paragraphs are direct quotation:
“Zappai and Senryū” entry
Zappai and senryū
Types of Zappai – Some zappai forms such as maekuzuke and kasazuke follow the principles of linked verse, in which the poet adds a capping verse (tsukeku) to a previously given verse (maeku). Zappai also includes independent unlinked forms which developed from the hokku, such as kiriku and oriku. Senryū was a relatively late unlinked form which developed from the tsukeku portion of maekuzuke verses.
Maekuzuke was a traditional form of literary amusement in which a given short verse of 14 syllables was capped by a long verse of 17 syllables to arrive at the 31-syllable length of the traditional tanka form; alternately, a long verse could be capped by a short one. Maekuzuke represents the original font of Japanese linked verse, and even after it was superseded by the longer and more sophisticated linked verse forms of renga and haikai, it survived both as a comic entertainment and a practice form by which poets could study and improve their linking technique. In the early Genroku era maekuzuke achieved great popularity among the urban populatIon, and maekozuke competitions in which tsukeku on a given maeku were selected and graded by professional poetry masters drew large numbers of participants. Winning verses were printed and distributed, and prizes were awarded.
Unlike haikai poetry, in which the maeku and the tsukeku were considered equally important, maekuzuke composition emphasized the interest of the tsukeku alone. For this reason, the 14-syllable short verse was fixed as the maeku, and its content became simple to the point of being perfunctory. Ultimately it lost all poetic meaning and served merely to introduce the theme of the 17-syllable long verse, which simultaneously gained great freedom in both content and expression. With the surge in popularity of maekuzuke in the Genroku era [1688-1733], many professional poetry masters began to follow the public trend of viewing maekuzuke composition as an end in itself rather than as a mere practice technique, and some devoted themselves exclusively to the judging of maekuzuke. Among the most notable of these masters were Tachiba Fukaku (1662—1733), Shūgetsu (fl early 18th century), and Karai Senryū (1718—90).
In kasazuke, the malor linked-verse font of zappai, a 5-syllable maeku is capped by a 12-syllable tsukeku. The completed poem is thus 17 syllables long, like a hokku, although unlike a hokku it does not require a season word. This break from the conventional number of syllables in each verse gave rise to numerous other metrical variations.
Kinku and oriku, both of which were nonlinked forms, also did away with the principle of establishing a seasonal theme. This feature greatly simplified verse composition and won favor with amateur poets daunted by the complexities of using season words. Unlike the linked-verse forms, kiriku and oriku were meant to be composed and appreciated as complete poems, rather than as parts of a continuing series. In kiriku, as in kasazuke, a verse of 12 syllables was added to a given verse of 5 syllables to create a complete poem of 17 syllables. Although originally less attention may have been paid to linking technique in kiriku than in kasazuke, the two forms were sufficiently similar to be considered later as a single type, commonly referred to as kammurizuke.
Oriku was an acrostic form in which either 2 given syllables were used respectively as the starting syllables for 2 lines of 7 syllables each, or 3 given syllables were used to start 3 lines of a verse in a 5-7-5 syllable pattern. While there were precedents for this type of poetic amusement in the earlier waka tradition, it reached the height of its popularity in the mid-18th century, especially in the Osaka area.
Senryū – As the tsukeku portions of maekuzuke verses came to be read and appreciated by themselves, they were called kyōku to distinguish them from hokku, with which they shared the same 17-syllable structure. The style of tsukeku selected and published by the maekuzuke judge Karai Senryū swept the entire nation starting in the Meiwa era (1764—72), and came to be known as Senryū-style kyōku. Senryū is a modern abbreviation of this term.
Starting with Mutamagawa (1750), a number of collections of superior tsukeku from maekuzuke competitions had been published without their maeku. These collections were widely read in the city of Edo (now Tokyo), and led to the publication in 1763 of the first Yanagidaru, a collection of tsukeku selected by the immensely popular standards of Karai Senryū. favorably received by Edo readers, it was followed by 22 more Yanagidaru collections issued by Senryū himself and, after his death, by 144 more issued by his successors. The early editions showed Senryū’s marked preference for a style similar to that of contemporary halkai poetry, but in treating the verses as independent entities and completely ignoring their origin as tsukeku they went a step beyond Mutamagawa.
The popularity of the Yanagidans series led to an increased emphasis on the independence of the tsukeku in Senryū’s maekuzuke competitions, and in his last years the competitions abandoned the maeku entirely and were limited to 17-syllable kyōku. At the same time, the light, witty, realistic sketches of everyday life in the haikai vein that had been predominant in the early Yanagidaru collections were gradually replaced by verses with an emphasis on humor, often quite bawdy, and novelty. This tendency was intensified by the practice of using set topics (kudai) for verse composition in place of the maeku, and ultimately led to both the production of large numbers of nearly identical verses and a tendency to overindulge in obscenity and stilted wordplay in an effort to achieve new comic effects. After the Meiji Restoration of 1868, however, a reform movement worked to curb excesses in senryū and revive it as a satirical poetic genre. It survives to this day as a form of poetic amusement, composed primarily by amateurs.
Literary Characteristics of Senryū – Senryū verse deals primarily with everyday people in everyday situations. One need not be a specialist to compose it. In fact, one notable characteristic of the Yanagidaru collections was that the poets remained anonymous; the tastes shown by the selector gave the collection its only touch of personal identity. In presenting historical legends it gives them a popular twist, and it tends to treat nature and living things from a distinctly human perspective. The qualities that give literary value to senryū are the light, witty realism of its expression and its penetrating, intuitive observation of human foibles and events generally overlooked by poets in other genres. At its best, the keen insights of senryū into social mores and daily life make for superior satire, but its inclination toward sharpness sometimes causes it to take an irresponsibly negative view of mankind and society, falling to the level of mere sarcasm and scandal-mongering.
References — R. H. Blyth, Senryū (1949). Miyata Masanobu, Zappaishi no kenkyū (1972). Okada Hajime, ed, Yanagidaro zenshū (Sanseidō, 1976-79). Suzuki Masatada et al, ed, Kibyōshi Senryu, Kyōka, vol 46 of Nikon koten bongaku zenshū, (Shōgakukan, 1971).
Author — Shiraishi Teizō.
Article Reference: Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan, Volume 8 (Kodansha, 1983, 1st edition), p. 368.
 Haiku Society of America, Inc. “Report of the Definitions Committee” adoped at the Annual Meeting of the Society, New York City, 18 September 2004. Full text available online:
 Cf. Gilbert, The Disjunctive Dragonfly, Endnote 5 (http://www.gendaihaiku.com/research/). Let’s look at how “zappai” has been applied in English prior to the HSA definition: In the Modern Haiku journal, Lee Gurga advanced the idea of a hierarchy or schema of haiku, with zappai at the bottom. He described zappai as “so-called haiku” and “imaginary.” The intent seems perjorative: “seventeen syllable poems that do not have proper formal or technical characteristics of haiku . . . if we look at all of what is presented today as 'haiku' a large number of so-called haiku are, like zappai, imaginative or imaginary" (Gurga, 2000, pp. 62-3).
 Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan, (Kodansha, 1983, 1st edition). See the entry "renga and haikai."
 Katō Ikuya (1929-2003) graduated from Waseda University. A renowned poet and critic, recipient of the Japanese literature Haiku Grand-Prix, and the Tomizawa Kakio Prize. In 1999 the Katō Ikuya Award for Poetry was established in his honor. The Japanese text quoted in this article is available here:
 Katsutada Suzuki is an acclaimed authority of Edo-period popular literature, particularly haikai, senryū and zappai. He is the author of several books, including Senryu and Zappai: The World of Popular Edo-period Literature [Senryu zappai Edo shomin no sekai], Miki Shobo, 1996, and The Complete Works of Japanese Classic Literature 79, New Edition: Kibyoushi [popular fiction], Senryu and Kyouka [humorous and vulgar tanka, beginning in the Manyoushu)] [shinpen nihon koten bungaku zenshyu: kibyoushi, senryu, kyouka], Shogakkan, 1999.
 Shinjuku Rollingstone is a haikai poet. Before he used this pseudonym he learned English haiku composition from Catherine Urquart. Shinjuku was born in Kumamoto, Japan, and spent many years in Tokyo, before returning to his hometown. He claims to have studied the history of Japanese literature — as an appetizer for sake.
 Cf. Gilbert and Yoneoka, “From 5-7-5 to 8-8-8: An Investigation of Japanese Haiku Metrics and Implications for English Haiku,” Language Issues: Journal of the Foreign Language Education Center. Prefectural University of Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan, 2000.